Skip to main content
Maryland Will Contests
Support GuideMaryland14 min read

Maryland Will Contests

How to contest a Maryland will through a caveat: the grounds, who can file, the six-month deadline, and how the Orphans' Court hears the challenge.

By Settled Editorial

In Maryland, a will challenge is called a caveat. An interested person can ask the Orphans' Court to set aside a will that does not reflect what the decedent actually wanted, but the challenge has to rest on a real legal ground, the person filing has to have standing, and the petition has to be filed within six months after the first personal representative is appointed under the will.

A caveat is not a way to reargue how someone chose to split their property. Maryland courts do not undo a valid will because a family member feels shortchanged. The challenge has to point to a defect the law recognizes: a maker who lacked capacity, pressure that overpowered the maker's free choice, fraud or forgery, or a signing that broke the statute's rules. This guide walks through the grounds, who can file, the six-month deadline, where the case is heard, no-contest clauses, and what the process involves.

Most Maryland wills are never challenged. But when the circumstances raise real concern, a caregiver who appeared late and took most of the estate, a signing during serious illness, or a signature that looks wrong, a caveat may be the right path. Read this next to the Maryland will requirements guide, which sets out the execution rules a contest attacks, and the Maryland probate guide for how the Register of Wills and the Orphans' Court run an estate.

What a Caveat Is (and Is Not)

A caveat asks the court to declare that the will, or part of it, is invalid. If the challenge succeeds, the admitted will is set aside, and the estate passes either under an earlier valid will or, if there is none, under Maryland's intestate succession rules. A caveat is the wrong tool when the real complaint is that you expected more, that you dislike the split, or that the personal representative is doing a poor job. That last problem is handled by objecting to the personal representative or the administration account, not by attacking the will.

A caveat is also different from a surviving spouse's elective share. A spouse who is unhappy with what a valid will leaves them does not caveat the will. The spouse elects instead, taking a set fraction of the estate subject to election: one-third with surviving descendants and one-half without. (Source: Md. Code, Estates and Trusts §3-403.) That remedy has its own rules and deadline; see the Maryland surviving spouse rights guide.

Who Can File a Caveat in Maryland

Only an interested person can file a caveat, meaning someone with a financial stake, a person who would inherit more if the will were thrown out. The people who usually file are:

  • Heirs at law. People who would inherit under Maryland's intestate succession statute if there were no valid will. That group runs from the surviving spouse and children out to parents, siblings, and more distant kin, depending on who survives.
  • Beneficiaries under a prior will. If an earlier will left you more than the current one, you have a stake in setting the later will aside.
  • Beneficiaries named in the challenged will, usually when an earlier document treated them better.

Friends, distant relatives who would not inherit under intestacy, and charities not named in any version of the will generally lack standing. The test is plain: would you be better off financially if the will were declared invalid? If not, the court will not hear your challenge.

The Grounds for Contesting a Maryland Will

Maryland recognizes a short set of grounds for invalidating a will. The person filing the caveat carries the burden of proof. A will admitted to probate is treated as valid, and the person challenging it has to overcome that with evidence. A hunch is not enough.

1. Lack of Testamentary Capacity

Maryland requires the maker to be at least 18 and legally competent to make a will. (Source: Md. Code, Estates and Trusts §4-102.) Legal competence means the maker understood, at the moment of signing:

  1. That they were making a will to dispose of their property at death
  2. The general nature and extent of what they owned
  3. The people who would ordinarily inherit from them, such as a spouse and children
  4. How the will distributed the property among those people

Capacity is measured at the exact time of signing, not before or after. A diagnosis of dementia does not by itself prove incapacity, because a person with cognitive decline can have a lucid interval and validly sign during it. To win on this ground, a challenger usually relies on medical records from around the signing date, testimony from doctors and caregivers, and observations from people who saw the maker near that time.

2. Undue Influence

Undue influence is the ground people most often allege and one of the hardest to prove. It applies when someone in a position of trust used pressure or control that overpowered the maker's free will, so the will reflects the influencer's wishes rather than the maker's own. Ordinary persuasion, even forceful persuasion, is not enough. Maryland courts look for a confidential relationship between the maker and the beneficiary, paired with suspicious circumstances around how the will came to be.

Common warning signs include a caregiver or new companion who appeared shortly before the will changed, a maker isolated from family, an unexplained break from an earlier estate plan, and a beneficiary who chose the drafting attorney or sat in on the signing. Because a confidential relationship can change how the evidence is weighed, these cases often turn on the pattern of circumstances rather than a single document.

3. Fraud or Forgery

Fraud means the maker was deliberately deceived in a way that changed the will. Two forms come up. Fraud in the execution is where the maker was tricked about what the document was, told they were signing a power of attorney when it was a will. Fraud in the inducement is where false information changed a gift, a lie that a child had stolen from them. Forgery is a separate claim that the signature on the will is not the maker's, or that the document was fabricated, and it usually calls for a document examiner to compare the disputed signature against known samples.

Forgery and fabrication claims deserve extra attention in Maryland because the state accepts almost no handwritten wills. A will written entirely in the maker's hand and signed without witnesses is valid only for a member of the armed services who signs it outside the United States, and even then it lapses one year after discharge. (Source: Md. Code, Estates and Trusts §4-103.) A handwritten, unwitnessed page offered as a civilian's will fails on its face.

4. Improper Execution

A Maryland will is valid only if it was signed the way the statute requires. Under Md. Code, Estates and Trusts §4-102, a will must be in writing, signed by the maker (or by another person for the maker, in the maker's physical presence and at the maker's express direction), and attested and signed by two or more credible witnesses in the maker's presence. A caveat on this ground argues that a formality was missed: only one witness signed, a witness never actually saw the maker sign or acknowledge the will, a witness signed outside the maker's presence, or a handwritten page was passed off as a valid will when it was not. Improper execution is often easier to prove than the mental-state grounds because it turns on procedural facts rather than the maker's state of mind. The Maryland will requirements guide lays out each formality a challenge tests.

5. A Later Will or Revocation

A will can also be attacked as no longer operative because the maker revoked it. Maryland allows revocation by a later valid will that says so or leaves terms that cannot both stand, by a physical act such as burning, canceling, tearing, or obliterating the document, by a marriage followed by the birth or adoption of a surviving child, and by an absolute divorce or annulment that cancels the provisions for the former spouse. (Source: Md. Code, Estates and Trusts §4-105.) If a valid later will exists, the earlier admitted document should not govern.

The Six-Month Caveat Deadline

Timing decides many Maryland caveats before the merits ever come up. A verified petition to caveat a will may be filed at any time before six months pass after the first appointment of a personal representative under a will. (Source: Md. Code, Estates and Trusts §5-207.) The clock runs from that first appointment, not from the date of death and not from when you learned about the will. If a different will is offered for probate later, the window stretches to the later of three months after that probate or six months after the first appointment.

A caveat also sets the machinery in motion. A petition to caveat filed before a petition for probate, or after administrative probate, has the effect of a request for judicial probate, which moves the estate off the routine administrative track and into a supervised proceeding. (Source: §5-207.) One more path exists for problems discovered later: an interested person can ask the court to reopen and set aside an administrative probate within 18 months after death on grounds that include fraud, a material mistake, or a serious irregularity in the earlier proceeding, a lack of the required notice, or being unaware of a will at the time. (Source: Md. Code, Estates and Trusts §5-304.) Even with that backstop, the six-month caveat window is the deadline to plan around. Building a caveat takes time to gather records, locate witnesses, and retain an expert, so the window is short, and once the deadline passes the right to challenge is generally lost for good. For how a dispute stretches the estate calendar, see the Maryland probate timeline guide.

Where the Case Is Heard: The Orphans' Court

Maryland runs probate through two offices in each of its 24 jurisdictions. The elected Register of Wills opens the estate, files the will, and keeps the records. The Orphans' Court, a three-judge probate court, supervises administration and hears disputes, including caveats. In Montgomery, Harford, and Howard counties there is no separately elected Orphans' Court, so the Circuit Court judges sit as the Orphans' Court instead. Baltimore City and Baltimore County are separate jurisdictions, each with its own Register of Wills and Orphans' Court, so confirm which office controls the estate before you file. The Maryland Register of Wills directory lists the office for each county and Baltimore City.

When a caveat raises a disputed question of fact, that question does not have to stay with the Orphans' Court judges. On a party's timely request, the Orphans' Court transmits the contested issues of fact to a court of law, the Circuit Court, where they can be tried, and a jury may decide them. (Source: Md. Code, Estates and Trusts §2-105.) That is why a Maryland caveat can start in the Orphans' Court and end in front of a Circuit Court jury.

No-Contest (In Terrorem) Clauses

Some wills include a no-contest clause, also called an in terrorem clause, that tries to disinherit any beneficiary who challenges the will. A typical version reads: if any beneficiary contests this will, that person's share is forfeited. The point is to scare beneficiaries out of litigating.

Maryland courts have generally enforced these clauses, and the stakes rise when one is present. A beneficiary who files a caveat and loses can forfeit a gift they would otherwise have kept. Whether a court will hold the forfeiture against a challenger who had a genuine, good-faith reason to file, rather than a fishing expedition, is a fact-specific question, so the clause and the supporting evidence are worth reviewing with a licensed Maryland attorney. A no-contest clause sets up a trade-off between what a beneficiary could forfeit by challenging and what a successful caveat could recover.

What the Caveat Process Involves

A Maryland caveat generally moves through the same stages, and knowing them helps set expectations.

  1. Consulting a probate litigator. A caveat is litigation, not routine estate paperwork. A Maryland attorney who handles contested estates can assess standing, the grounds, and the deadline before anything is filed.
  2. Confirming the will and the appointment. The Register of Wills for the county or Baltimore City has the record of whether the will was filed, whether probate was administrative or judicial, and who was appointed personal representative and when. That appointment date starts the six-month clock.
  3. The verified petition to caveat. The challenge begins with a verified petition filed within the six-month window, stating the grounds and naming the personal representative and the affected beneficiaries. A petition filed before probate, or after administrative probate, converts the matter to judicial probate before the Orphans' Court.
  4. Discovery. Both sides exchange evidence: depositions of the drafting attorney, the attesting witnesses, caregivers, and family; subpoenas for medical and financial records; and expert reports on capacity or handwriting.
  5. Mediation and settlement. Many caveats settle. A negotiated redistribution often costs far less than a trial and lets the family keep some control over the result.
  6. Trial. If the case does not settle, the Orphans' Court decides it, or the contested issues of fact go to the Circuit Court, where a judge or jury rules. The challenger has to overcome the presumption that the admitted will is valid.

What a Caveat Costs and Whether It Is Worth It

Caveats are expensive and slow. Even a fairly clean case can take a year or more and run well into five figures in attorney fees, plus costs for experts, depositions, and records, and relatives often end up testifying under oath about a loved one's mental state and private affairs. A few questions are worth working through with a licensed Maryland attorney before any caveat:

  • Standing. Would the person challenging actually inherit more if the will were set aside?
  • A recognized ground. Is there evidence of incapacity, undue influence, fraud, forgery, or a signing defect, not just disappointment?
  • A no-contest clause. Is one present, and how might it apply?
  • The likely recovery against the cost and the family strain, and whether mediation could resolve the dispute faster and for less.

Because the six-month deadline after the first appointment is unforgiving and the evidence is easiest to gather early, timing shapes every caveat. For the duties the personal representative owes while a dispute plays out, see the Maryland executor duties guide.

Related Guides

This guide is general information about contesting a Maryland will. A caveat involves complex litigation, and the six-month deadline is short, so confirm your grounds, your standing, and the current deadline with a licensed Maryland attorney before you file.

Sources:

It is not legal advice.

Information current as of July 21, 2026

Settled Estate is not a law firm, and this content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Probate laws and procedures in Maryland can change. Consult with a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation. Full disclaimer.

Need help with your probate case?

Answer a few questions to see whether Maryland probate is required and which process applies.

Take the 2-minute assessment
All Maryland guides← Back to all articles