Oklahoma Digital Assets After Death

Most Oklahoma estates now hold property that never existed on paper: an email account, a photo library in the cloud, a bank login, a mineral owner portal, sometimes a hardware wallet in a desk drawer. Oklahoma answered the question of who may reach those accounts on November 1, 2024, and the answer arrived fourteen years after the state's first attempt at it.

The live law is the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, 58 O.S. §§ 3101 through 3119, added by Laws 2024, c. 115. The one-sentence 2010 statute at 58 O.S. § 269 was not repealed and still sits in the same title.

Three rules carry most of the weight. A direction the account holder gave through the provider's own online tool beats a will. The content of messages is walled off from everything else and needs consent. And a custodian that receives a proper request has 60 days to answer.

Oklahoma Got a Full Digital Assets Act on November 1, 2024

58 O.S. § 3101 gives the chapter its short title. Every one of the nineteen sections carries the same history line: Added by Laws 2024, c. 115, eff. Nov. 1, 2024. None of them has been amended since.

58 O.S. § 3103 sets the reach, and it looks backward as well as forward. The act applies to a fiduciary acting under a will or power of attorney executed before, on, or after November 1, 2024, to a personal representative acting for a decedent who died before, on, or after that date, to a guardianship commenced at any point, and to a trustee under a trust created at any point. A 2019 will and a 2021 death are both inside the act.

Two limits sit in the same section. Subsection B reaches a custodian if the user resides in Oklahoma or resided here at the time of death. Subsection C carves out a digital asset of an employer used by an employee in the ordinary course of the employer's business, so a work laptop and a work inbox belong to the employer rather than the estate.

58 O.S. § 3102(7) defines the court for this act simply as the court of proper jurisdiction. For a decedent's estate that is the district court, because 58 O.S. § 1 places probate jurisdiction there, and Oklahoma runs probate through the district court in each of its 77 counties with no separate probate court anywhere. The Oklahoma probate court directory lists them, and the Oklahoma probate guide covers how the appointment itself works.

The 2010 Statute Still Sits Beside It

Here is the part national explainers get wrong about Oklahoma. 58 O.S. § 269 survives unamended, and it reads in full:

The executor or administrator of an estate shall have the power, where otherwise authorized, to take control of, conduct, continue, or terminate any accounts of a deceased person on any social networking website, any microblogging or short message service website or any e-mail service websites.

Laws 2010, c. 181, § 1 added that sentence effective November 1, 2010, and nothing since has touched it. Read the two side by side and the division of labor shows.

58 O.S. § 269 speaks to the personal representative. It says the representative holds the power, and it qualifies the grant with the phrase where otherwise authorized. It never tells a provider to do anything.
58 O.S. §§ 3106 through 3108 speak to the custodian. They say what a provider must disclose, on which documents, and inside which deadline.

A letter to a provider's legal department earns nothing by citing the 2010 section alone, because that section imposes no duty on the recipient. Cite the request sections and name § 269 alongside them.

What Counts as a Digital Asset in Oklahoma

58 O.S. § 3102(10) defines a digital asset as an electronic record in which an individual has a right or interest, then draws the line that matters for an inventory: the term does not include an underlying asset or liability unless the asset or liability is itself an electronic record.

Read those two halves together and the working scope comes out like this:

Email accounts on Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo and the rest
Cloud storage and photo libraries on iCloud, Google Photos or Dropbox
Social media profiles on Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn and TikTok
Exchange accounts holding Bitcoin, Ethereum or other tokens
Domain names and websites the person registered or ran
Online banking, PayPal and payment app logins
Mineral and royalty owner portals, which many Oklahoma families reach only through a website login
Loyalty balances such as airline miles and card points
Subscriptions that keep billing the estate every month
Online storefronts, ad accounts and affiliate accounts

The login and the records behind it are the digital asset. The money behind a bank login is not, and neither is the severed mineral interest behind a royalty portal, because neither one is itself an electronic record. Those pass under ordinary Oklahoma law, which the Oklahoma executor duties guide walks through.

The Order Oklahoma Reads Your Directions In

58 O.S. § 3104 sets a three-step order, and an Oklahoma fiduciary works down it in this sequence.

Step one, the online tool. Subsection A lets a user direct a custodian, through an online tool, to disclose to a designated recipient or to withhold some or all digital assets, including the content of electronic communications. Where the tool allows the user to modify or delete the direction at all times, that direction overrides a contrary direction by the user in a will, trust, power of attorney, or other record. 58 O.S. § 3102(16) defines the online tool narrowly, as an electronic service the custodian provides under an agreement distinct from the terms-of-service agreement, so a checkbox buried inside the terms of service does not qualify.

The named examples are ones many people already have. Google Inactive Account Manager releases chosen data to chosen people after a set period of inactivity. Facebook Legacy Contact names someone to manage a memorialized profile. Apple Legacy Contact names someone who can request Apple Account data after death.

That first step also creates a person the rest of the act keeps referring to. 58 O.S. § 3102(9) defines a designated recipient as someone chosen by a user through an online tool to administer the user's digital assets, and § 3116 lets a designated recipient make a request and go to court over it, without any appointment from a judge.

Step two, your own documents. Subsection B applies where the user did not use an online tool or the custodian offered none. Then the user may allow or prohibit disclosure in a will, trust, power of attorney, or other record. This is the tier an attorney drafts for, and the Oklahoma estate planning basics guide covers the documents it runs through.

Step three, the terms of service. With no online tool and no direction in a document, the agreement between the user and the provider decides. 58 O.S. § 3105(C) says access may be modified or eliminated by the user, by federal law, or by a terms-of-service agreement where the user has not provided direction under § 3104.

One counterweight sits in 58 O.S. § 3104(C). A user's direction overrides a contrary terms-of-service provision that does not require the user to act affirmatively and distinctly from the user's assent to the terms of service. A buried clause loses to a real choice.

Content and Catalog Are Two Different Requests

Oklahoma splits a deceased person's communications across two sections, and that split decides what a personal representative actually reads.

The catalog, defined at 58 O.S. § 3102(4), is the information identifying each person with which a user has had an electronic communication, the time and date of the communication, and the electronic address of the person. The definition stops there. It does not reach the subject line.
The content, defined at 58 O.S. § 3102(6), is information concerning the substance or meaning of a communication that the user sent or received, that a custodian holds in electronic storage or carries as a remote-computing service, and that is not readily accessible to the public.

58 O.S. § 3108 covers the catalog and every other digital asset. A custodian shall disclose it to the personal representative unless the user prohibited disclosure of digital assets or the court directs otherwise.

58 O.S. § 3107 covers content, and it opens only if a deceased user consented or a court directs disclosure.

So an Oklahoma personal representative can often learn that the decedent exchanged messages with a bank on a given date without being able to read what those messages said. Generic authority language in a will does not close that gap. Consent to disclosure of the content of electronic communications has to be written in.

What a Personal Representative Sends an Oklahoma Custodian

Both routes run on a document list, and the lists are short.

For the catalog and other digital assets under 58 O.S. § 3108, the representative gives the custodian a written request in physical or electronic form, a certified copy of the death certificate, and a certified copy of the letter of appointment or a small-estate affidavit or a court order. If the custodian asks, add the account identifier, evidence linking the account to the user, an affidavit stating that disclosure is reasonably necessary for administration of the estate, or a court finding to the same effect.

For content under 58 O.S. § 3107, add one item: unless the user gave direction through an online tool, a copy of the user's will, trust, power of attorney, or other record evidencing consent to disclosure of content. A custodian may also ask the court to find that the user held a specific identifiable account, that disclosure would not violate 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. or 47 U.S.C. § 222 or other applicable law, that the user consented, or that disclosure is reasonably necessary for administration of the estate.

Date the request and keep proof of delivery, because the 60-day clock in § 3116 runs from receipt of the required information rather than from the day you first wrote.

A Small Estate Affidavit Works in Place of Letters

This is the Oklahoma wrinkle worth carrying into a request letter. Both 58 O.S. § 3107(3) and 58 O.S. § 3108(3) accept a small-estate affidavit as an alternative to a certified letter of appointment.

Oklahoma's affidavit route sits at 58 O.S. § 393. At any time ten or more days after the death, a person holding the decedent's property pays or delivers it to a claiming successor on presentation of an affidavit stating that the fair market value of property located in Oklahoma, less liens and encumbrances, does not exceed $50,000, that no application or petition for appointment of a personal representative is pending or has been granted in any jurisdiction, that each claiming successor is entitled to the stated share, and that taxes and debts of the estate are paid, provided for, or barred.

Two features of that route matter to a digital request. The affidavit is presented to the holder of the property rather than filed with a court, and 58 O.S. § 394 discharges the holder who relies on it to the same extent as if it had dealt with a personal representative. So a successor who never opened a probate case can still ask a custodian for the catalog and other digital assets. Signing one knowingly false carries a fine of up to $3,000 or up to six months in jail under § 393(E), plus restitution.

One asymmetry is worth catching before you write. The account-termination list at 58 O.S. § 3115(G) names a certified copy of the letter of appointment, a court order, a power of attorney, or a trust giving the fiduciary authority over the account. The small-estate affidavit does not appear on that list, even though §§ 3107 and 3108 accept it for disclosure. Read the statute rather than a provider's intake form here, and read the right subsection for what you are asking.

Custodians Get 60 Days

58 O.S. § 3116(A) is the deadline that gives an Oklahoma family real footing. Not later than sixty days after receipt of the information required under Sections 7 through 15 of the act, which is 58 O.S. §§ 3107 through 3115, a custodian shall comply with a request to disclose digital assets or terminate an account. Where it fails to comply, the fiduciary or designated recipient may apply to the court for an order directing compliance, and subsection B says that order must contain a finding that compliance is not in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2702.

Four more subsections shape how that plays out.

Subsection C lets the custodian notify the user that a request was made.
Subsection D lets the custodian deny a request where it is aware of any lawful access to the account following receipt of the request, which is a reason to stop logging in on the decedent's behalf once you have asked.
Subsection E preserves the custodian's ability to require a court order about a protected person or principal, covering account ownership, sufficient consent, and any finding required by other law.
Subsection F grants the custodian and its officers, employees and agents immunity for an act or omission done in good faith in compliance with the act. That last one is often the reassurance a hesitant legal department is waiting to hear.

What an Oklahoma Custodian May Do With Your Request

58 O.S. § 3106 gives the provider room, and knowing the room saves an argument.

At its sole discretion, the custodian may grant full account access, grant partial access sufficient to perform the tasks the fiduciary is charged with, or provide a copy of a record of any digital asset that the user could have accessed on the date the custodian received the request. It may assess a reasonable administrative charge for the cost of disclosing. It need not disclose a digital asset the user deleted. And where segregating a partial request would impose an undue burden, either side may ask the court to order disclosure of a subset limited by date, of everything, of nothing, or of everything to the court for review in camera.

So a request for one folder of email can lawfully come back as a full export, a refusal, or a court hearing. Ask for the narrowest set that answers your question and say in the letter why it is narrow.

An Agent Under a Power of Attorney

Oklahoma handles the living principal in two sections that set different bars.

Under 58 O.S. § 3109, a custodian discloses content to an agent only to the extent the power of attorney expressly grants the agent authority over the content of electronic communications. The agent supplies a written request, the original or a copy of that power of attorney, and a certification under penalty of perjury that the power of attorney is in effect.

Under 58 O.S. § 3110, a custodian discloses the catalog and other digital assets to an agent with specific authority over digital assets or general authority to act on behalf of the principal, on the same three items.

Oklahoma wrote the matching rule into its power of attorney act three years earlier. 58 O.S. § 3024(A)(8), added by Laws 2021, c. 332, lists exercising authority over the content of electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12) among the nine powers an agent holds only if the document expressly grants them. The two acts agree, and a form that grants broad financial authority without that express line still leaves the agent outside § 3109. The Oklahoma power of attorney guide covers the other eight express-grant powers and the statutory form that prints them.

Trustees Hand Over the Trust Instrument Itself

A trustee who is the original account holder gets everything. 58 O.S. § 3111 requires a custodian to disclose any digital asset of the account held in trust, including the catalog and the content, unless a court orders otherwise or the trust provides otherwise.

A trustee who is not the original user works through 58 O.S. § 3112 for content and 58 O.S. § 3113 for everything else. Both ask for a written request, a certified copy of the trust instrument, and a certification under penalty of perjury that the trust exists and the trustee is currently acting. The content section adds one requirement: that trust instrument has to include consent to disclosure of the content of electronic communications to the trustee.

Read those two lists closely, because Oklahoma's version is stricter than some. Each one names the certified copy of the trust instrument. Neither offers a short certification of trust as a substitute, so a trustee who expected to keep the trust's terms private should plan for producing the document.

Guardians Go Through the Appointment Hearing

58 O.S. § 3114 handles a living protected person, and it ties access to the guardianship case rather than to a letter.

Subsection A says that after an opportunity for a hearing under 30 O.S. § 3-112, the court may grant a guardian access to the digital assets of a protected person. That cross-reference points at the section of Oklahoma's Guardianship and Conservatorship Act that appoints a general or limited guardian of the person and, as the court finds necessary, a guardian of the property.

Subsection B then requires a custodian to disclose the catalog and other digital assets, though not the content, on a written request plus a certified copy of the court order that gives the guardian authority over the digital assets of the protected person. Subsection C separately lets a guardian with general authority to manage the protected person's assets ask a custodian to suspend or terminate an account for good cause, on a certified copy of the order giving authority over the property.

58 O.S. § 3102(5) defines guardian for this act as a person appointed by a court to manage the estate of a living individual, and it includes a limited guardian. An order naming a guardian of the person alone does not carry the property authority these subsections ask for. The Oklahoma guardianship planning guide covers how the appointment happens.

Fiduciary Duties and the Computer Fraud Line

58 O.S. § 3115 sets the duties that travel with the access.

Subsection A applies the duty of care, the duty of loyalty and the duty of confidentiality to digital assets exactly as they apply to tangible property. Subsection B subjects the fiduciary's authority to the applicable terms of service except as § 3104 provides, to other law including copyright law, and to the scope of the fiduciary's duties, then bars using the authority to impersonate the user.

Subsections C through E matter for anything sitting on a device. A fiduciary has the right to access a digital asset not held by a custodian or subject to a terms-of-service agreement, is an authorized user for the purpose of computer fraud and unauthorized computer access laws while acting within the scope of the fiduciary's duties, and has the right to access the decedent's tangible personal property along with any digital asset stored in it.

That authorized-user line is narrower than it sounds. It covers a fiduciary acting in role. It does not cover a family member who knows the password and logs in before anyone is appointed. Federal law, including the Stored Communications Act, still governs a provider's disclosure, and most terms of service still forbid password sharing. Use the statutory route and the provider's own channel.

Cryptocurrency Needs Its Own Plan

Crypto splits into two cases in Oklahoma, and the act reaches only one of them cleanly.

On an exchange, the exchange is a custodian. Coinbase, Kraken and their peers hold the keys and run an estates process much like a bank, so the § 3108 document package and the 60-day clock in § 3116 apply.

In a self-custody wallet, there is no custodian at all. 58 O.S. § 3115(C) gives the fiduciary the right to access an asset held outside any custodian relationship, and that right is a legal permission rather than a technical one. No private key means no coins, and no district court order changes that.

When you are settling an Oklahoma estate that might hold crypto, look for a small hardware device, a written or stamped list of 12 or 24 words, files named wallet, seed or recovery, and exchange confirmation emails. Once you have access, record the holdings and the date-of-death value promptly, because those values swing hard and that figure drives both the inventory and the beneficiary's basis.

For your own planning, keep seed phrases out of unsecured files and out of your will. A will becomes a public court record once it is filed for probate, which the Oklahoma will requirements guide covers.

The Record Can Be Electronic Now

58 O.S. § 3104(B) lets the direction live in a will, trust, power of attorney, or other record. A second 2024 act decides whether that record can be electronic.

The Uniform Electronic Estate Planning Documents Act, 84 O.S. §§ 911 through 927, added by Laws 2024, c. 344, also took effect November 1, 2024. 84 O.S. § 912(5) defines a non-testamentary estate planning document as a record relating to estate planning that is readable as text when signed and is not a will or contained in a will, then names trust instruments, memoranda and certifications of trust, durable powers of attorney, an agent's certification, powers of appointment, advance directives, guardian nominations, mental health treatment declarations, and a catch-all for any other record intended to carry out an individual's intent regarding property or health care while incapacitated or on death. It excludes a deed of real property and a certificate of title for a motor vehicle, watercraft, or aircraft.

84 O.S. § 917 says such a document may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form, and that an electronic record satisfies a writing requirement while an electronic signature satisfies a signature requirement. 84 O.S. § 926 applies the act to a document created or signed before, on, or after its effective date. Two limits keep it honest: 84 O.S. § 914(B) steps aside where the document itself precludes an electronic record or signature, and 84 O.S. § 916 says nobody is required to go electronic, a subsection no person may waive.

One citation trap deserves a flag, because Oklahoma named two acts almost identically in the same session. 84 O.S. § 901 carries the short title "Oklahoma Uniform Electronic Estate Planning Documents Act" and governs electronic wills. 84 O.S. § 911 carries the short title "Uniform Electronic Estate Planning Documents Act" and governs the non-testamentary documents above. One word apart. Cite §§ 901 through 910 for a will and §§ 911 through 927 for a trust, power of attorney or directive, and never blend them.

Steps to Take Now

Three moves cover most of the risk, and none of them needs a lawyer to start.

Set the Online Tools This Week

They sit at the top of the § 3104 order and they take minutes:

Google: Data and privacy, then Make a plan for your account
Facebook: Settings, then Memorialization Settings, to name a Legacy Contact
Apple: Your name, then Sign-In and Security, then Legacy Contact

Ask for Content Consent in Writing

Have the attorney who drafts your will, trust or power of attorney add language that authorizes your fiduciary to access, manage and close your digital accounts and consents to disclosure of the content of your electronic communications. That consent is what opens 58 O.S. § 3107. A general phrase about handling your affairs does not. If you are naming an agent, ask for the § 3024(A)(8) express grant in the same sitting.

Keep an Inventory, Not a Password List

Write down which accounts exist and where the credentials live, then keep it current. Store the credentials themselves in a password manager, leave a sealed letter of instruction with your estate documents, and point to that separate letter in your will instead of pasting logins into it.

When to Talk With an Oklahoma Attorney

Bring an Oklahoma estate attorney in when a provider refuses a request that meets the statute, when you need a court order for content under 58 O.S. § 3107, when a custodian claims an undue burden under 58 O.S. § 3106(D), or when the estate holds a digital business, a monetized channel, or crypto worth real money. Those are the situations where the 60-day clock in § 3116 turns into a filing rather than a follow-up email. Where the decedent left no will at all, the Oklahoma intestate succession guide covers who ends up holding these accounts.

Planning ahead costs less than any of that. Setting the online tools and asking for a content-consent clause takes an afternoon and removes the two most common reasons an Oklahoma family gets told no.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does an Oklahoma personal representative automatically get into the deceased person's online accounts?

No. 58 O.S. § 3104 makes access turn on what the account holder left behind. A direction given through the provider's own online tool comes first, a direction in a will, trust, power of attorney or other record comes second, and the terms-of-service agreement decides only where neither exists. Letters of appointment prove who you are. They do not by themselves prove the deceased user consented to disclosure of message content, which 58 O.S. § 3107 requires.

When did Oklahoma's digital assets law take effect?

November 1, 2024. The Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act sits at 58 O.S. §§ 3101 through 3119 and was added by Laws 2024, c. 115. 58 O.S. § 3103 reaches backward as well as forward: it applies to a fiduciary acting under a will or power of attorney executed before, on, or after that date, to a personal representative acting for a decedent who died before, on, or after it, to a guardianship commenced at any point, and to a trustee under a trust created at any point.

Did Oklahoma's 2010 social media statute go away?

No. 58 O.S. § 269 still reads as it did when Laws 2010, c. 181 added it. It gives the executor or administrator power, where otherwise authorized, to take control of, conduct, continue, or terminate accounts on a social networking website, a microblogging or short message service website, or an e-mail service website. That section speaks to the representative's own power. The 2024 act speaks to the custodian and says what it must hand over and on which documents, so the two answer different halves of one question.

Can an Oklahoma small estate affidavit get a provider to release account records?

Yes for disclosure. 58 O.S. § 3108(3) accepts a certified copy of the letter of appointment or a small-estate affidavit or a court order, and § 3107(3) accepts the same three for message content. Oklahoma's affidavit sits at 58 O.S. § 393 and runs ten or more days after the death, on Oklahoma property worth $50,000 or less after liens and encumbrances, with no personal representative appointment pending or granted in any jurisdiction. The account-termination list in § 3115(G) is shorter and does not name the affidavit.

How long does a provider have to answer an Oklahoma fiduciary?

Sixty days. 58 O.S. § 3116(A) requires a custodian to comply with a request to disclose digital assets or terminate an account no later than 60 days after receipt of the information required under 58 O.S. §§ 3107 through 3115. Where the custodian fails to comply, the fiduciary or designated recipient may apply to the court for an order directing compliance, and § 3116(B) says that order must contain a finding that compliance is not in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2702.

Does Oklahoma's act let an executor read the deceased person's emails?

Only with consent or a court order. 58 O.S. § 3107 opens the content of electronic communications where the deceased user consented or a court directs disclosure, and it asks for the will, trust, power of attorney or other record evidencing that consent unless the user gave direction through an online tool. 58 O.S. § 3108 covers the catalog of electronic communications and every other digital asset on a shorter document list. The catalog under 58 O.S. § 3102(4) names who the user communicated with, the time and date, and that person's electronic address, and stops there.

What does an Oklahoma power of attorney need to say about digital accounts?

Two different things, depending on what the agent needs. 58 O.S. § 3110 releases the catalog and other digital assets to an agent with specific authority over digital assets or general authority to act for the principal. 58 O.S. § 3109 releases message content only to the extent the power of attorney expressly grants the agent authority over the content of electronic communications. Oklahoma's power of attorney act says the same thing from the other side at 58 O.S. § 3024(A)(8), which lists that authority among the nine powers that need an express grant.

Sources:

Title: 58 O.S. §§ 3101-3106, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, short title, definitions, applicability, online tool for disclosure of digital assets, construction with custodian, fiduciary or designated recipient rights, and procedure for disclosing digital assets (Laws 2024, c. 115, eff. Nov. 1, 2024). Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os58.pdf
Title: 58 O.S. §§ 3107-3110, Disclosure of electronic communications content of deceased user, Disclosure of electronic communications catalog of deceased user, Disclosure of electronic communications content of principal to agent, and Disclosure of other digital assets of principal to agent. Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os58.pdf
Title: 58 O.S. §§ 3111-3114, Disclosure of digital assets to trustee that is an original user, Disclosure of electronic communications content to trustee that is not an original user, Disclosure of other digital assets to trustee that is not an original user, and Disclosure of digital assets to guardian. Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os58.pdf
Title: 58 O.S. § 3115, Fiduciary duties and authority, and 58 O.S. § 3116, Compliance with request to disclose digital assets or terminate an account, Immunity from liability. Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os58.pdf
Title: 58 O.S. § 269, Executor or administrator, Powers (Laws 2010, c. 181, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2010). Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os58.pdf
Title: 58 O.S. § 393, Payment or delivery of property to successor by affidavit, and 58 O.S. § 394, Discharge and release upon payment or delivery of property by affidavit. Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os58.pdf
Title: 58 O.S. § 1, Probate jurisdiction and venue of district court, and 58 O.S. § 3024, Authority that requires specific grant, Grant of general authority. Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os58.pdf
Title: 84 O.S. §§ 911-927, Uniform Electronic Estate Planning Documents Act, and 84 O.S. § 901, Short title, Oklahoma Uniform Electronic Estate Planning Documents Act (Laws 2024, c. 344, eff. Nov. 1, 2024). Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os84.pdf
Title: 30 O.S. § 3-112, Appointment of guardians or limited guardians (Oklahoma Guardianship and Conservatorship Act). Publisher: Oklahoma Legislature. Publication Date: 2025 compilation, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os30.pdf
Title: About Inactive Account Manager. Publisher: Google. Publication Date: Not listed, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/3036546
Title: What is a legacy contact for a Facebook account. Publisher: Meta. Publication Date: Not listed, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://www.facebook.com/help/1568013990080948
Title: How to add a Legacy Contact for your Apple Account. Publisher: Apple. Publication Date: Not listed, accessed 2026-09-02. URL: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102631

It is not legal advice.